000 | 01890naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 8012417534110 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211163351.0 | ||
008 | 080124s2008 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aCROWLEY, Kate _933511 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aNew governance, green planning and sustainability : _btasmania together and growing victoria together |
260 |
_aBrisbane Queensland : _bBlackwell Publishers, _cMarch 2007 |
||
520 | 3 | _aBridgman and Davis (2000:91) have argued that ideally government will have a well developed and widely distributed policy framework, setting out economic, social and environmental objectives. This article compares and evaluates two such frameworks or plans, Tasmania Together and Growing Victoria Together, in terms of their potential to promote sustainability. It argues that they are very different exercises in new governance, aimed at reconnecting with community priorities and at redirecting macro-policy setting away from a preoccupation with economic priorities, respectively. Nevertheless, both plans have the capacity to green state planning, in Tasmania in terms of more purposeful benchmarks, and in Victoria in terms of enhanced sustainability emphasis in the macro-policy setting. The article encounters tensions in its review of the plans between deliberation and planning, policy empowerment and policy progress, and policy institutionalisation and politicisation as means of achieving policy change. It finds that whilst Tasmania and Victoria are re-engaged states that are reinventing state policy, as yet they are failing to meet the governance challenges of sustainability | |
700 | 1 |
_aCOFFEY, Brian _933512 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tAustralian Journal of Public Administration : AJPA _g66, 1, p. 23-37 _dBrisbane Queensland : Blackwell Publishers, March 2007 _xISSN 03136647 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20080124 _b1753^b _cTiago |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c25534 _d25534 |
||
041 | _aeng |