| 000 | 01475naa a2200205uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 8012912393219 | ||
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20190212110220.0 | ||
| 008 | 080129s1996 bl ||||gr |0|| 0 por d | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aPAIVA, Carlos Águedo Nagel _933601 |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aKalecki : _bum antikeynesiano? |
| 260 |
_aSão Paulo : _bNobel, _cjan./mar. 1996 |
||
| 520 | 3 | _aThis article aims to investigate the determinants of the limited diffusion and theoretical acceptance of Kaleckis work. In my opinion, the roots of the resistance to this author comes from the unusual way he combines the theoretical, methodological and analytical elements in his work. More specifically, its necessary to notice that, despite the theoretical substratum of his work is keynesian, the pattern of investigation and exposition used by Kalecki is structuralist, and comes up against Keynes methodological individualism. This contradiction the center of Keynes and Kaleckis usually hard dialogue also limits the dialogue with those two other schools our author considered scientific in Economies, the Marxism and the (neoclassical) Econometrics | |
| 590 | _aRevista de Economia Política 1996 | ||
| 590 | _av. 16, . 1(61) | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 |
_tRevista de Economia Política = Brazilian Journal of Political Economy _g16, 1, p. 70- _dSão Paulo : Nobel, jan./mar. 1996 _xISSN 01013157 _w |
| 942 | _cS | ||
| 998 |
_a20080129 _b1239^b _cMariana |
||
| 998 |
_a20140214 _b1003^b _ckarina |
||
| 999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c25612 _d25612 |
||
| 041 | _apor | ||