000			01535naa a2200169uu 4500
001			8022115221110
003			OSt
005			20190211163435.0
008			080221s2008 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aSCHNEIDER, Ursula _933680
245	1	0	_aCoping with the concept of knowledge
260			_aLondon : _bSage Publications, _cNovember 2007
520	3		_aIt seems obvious that management activity, especially in the traditional understanding of the concept, has to rely on a clear concept of its `target' or the `object' that is to be planned, organized, led and controlled. Nevertheless, this does not apply to the management of knowledge — or should I say to the management of knowing; or rather to the management of the generative dance between those two concepts? Knowledge, knowing and their interplay, have been dealt with quite differently throughout history and in different cultures. Does it make sense to dive into the `philosophical morass' behind attempts to clarify a concept of knowledge that so easily escapes our definitional grip? Or should we live with a fuzzy notion in knowledge management? The latter is supported by the article. However it juxtaposes `enlightened' fuzziness, inspiring creative search to dogmatic certainty and exclusion, which increase the danger to sink intellectual and financial capital into dead ends
773	0	8	_tManagement Learning _g38, 5, p. 613-633 _dLondon : Sage Publications, November 2007 _xISSN 13505076 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20080221 _b1522^b _cTiago
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c25717 _d25717
041			_aeng