| 000 | 01721naa a2200193uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 8030415432210 | ||
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20190212110446.0 | ||
| 008 | 080304s2008 bl ||||gr |0|| 0 por d | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aPAULANI, Leda Maria _98188 |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 | _aA Aventura crítica |
| 260 |
_aSão Paulo : _bEditora 34, _cjan./mar. 2008 |
||
| 520 | 3 | _aThe aim of this paper is to reply the critical observations made by Fernandes, Rego and Gala in this number of Revista de Economia Política about a paper of mine, also published in this same journal in January 2006, which deals with the relationship between Economics and Rethoric and its unfolding in Brazil. Answering these critical observations I have tried to show that: a) it is not easy, as they do, to associate Habermass project to the defense of the approach of Rethoric in Economics; Habermas himself has a lot of objections to the association of his project with Rortys pragmatism which seems to be the strongest McCloskeys influence; b) it is not true that my considerations have a kind of epistemological immunity and that they are not liable to contestations; if it seems so it is because the nature of the materialistic approach itself. At the end I observe that my carpers didnt reply my observations about the unfolding of the rethorical project in Brazil and that this is, at some measure, surprising, because they are central personages in it | |
| 590 | _av. 28, n. 1(109) | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 |
_tRevista de Economia Política = Brazilian Journal of Political Economy _g28, 1, p. 166-177 _dSão Paulo : Editora 34, jan./mar. 2008 _xISSN 01013157 _w |
| 942 | _cS | ||
| 998 |
_a20080304 _b1543^b _cTiago |
||
| 998 |
_a20140220 _b1045^b _ckarina |
||
| 999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c25808 _d25808 |
||
| 041 | _apor | ||