000			01445naa a2200205uu 4500
001			8030510403119
003			OSt
005			20190212110450.0
008			080305s2008 bl ||||gr |0|| 0 por d
100	1		_aKERCHE, Fábio _95513
245	1	0	_aAutonomia e Discricionariedade do Ministério público no Brasil
260			_aRio de Janeiro : _bIUPERJ, _c2007
520	3		_aThis article deals with the autonomy, discretionary power, and wide range of attributions allotted to the Public Prosecutor's Office in Brazil by the 1988 Constitution. One of the objectives is to analyze whether this combination is not alien to the democratic principle that state institutions, and even those that do not choose their members by direct elections, should be accountable to the public for their acts. The author draws on the neo-institutionalist literature on bureaucracy to analyze the Public Prosecutor's Office in Brazil. The conclusion is that there has been a quasi-abdication by politicians in relation to the institution in question, a rare occurrence in Brazil and in other
590			_aDADOS Revista de Ciências Sociais v. 50 n. 2 2007
773	0	8	_tDADOS Revista de Ciências Sociais _g50, 2, p. 259-279 _dRio de Janeiro : IUPERJ, 2007 _xISSN 0011-5258 _w
856	4	2	_uhttp://www.scielo.br/pdf/dados/v50n2/a02v50n2.pdf _yAcesso
942			_cS
998			_a20080305 _b1040^b _cMariana
998			_a20080924 _b1045^b _cZailton
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c25813 _d25813
041			_apor