| 000 | 01612naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 8030517155810 | ||
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20190211163445.0 | ||
| 008 | 080305s2008 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aKAUFMAN, Herbert _933757 |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aAdministrative management : _bdoes its strong executive thesis still merit our attention? |
| 260 |
_aMalden, MA : _bBlackwell Publishers, _cNovember / December 2007 |
||
| 520 | 3 | _aTasked with the responsibility of finding new and innovative ways of improving administrative management, Arthur W. Macmahon, James W. Fesler, and Herbert Emmerich creatively enriched the final report of the President’s Committee on Administrative Management with their analyses. But that is not the only reason for celebrating this work today. These documents still merit attention because they are historical landmarks that draw attention to the continuing tensions between Congress and the president over which branch of government should have control over executive branch agencies. This study makes the case for a strong executive in a manner that has rarely been as clearly and forcefully stated as it was in 1937. It reminds the field that policy decisions remain nothing but aspirations until they are turned into action. Reading this study is like reading any classic treatise on government—it generates thought | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 |
_tPublic administration review : PAR _g67, 6, p. 1041-1048 _dMalden, MA : Blackwell Publishers, November / December 2007 _xISSN 00333352 _w |
| 942 | _cS | ||
| 998 |
_a20080305 _b1715^b _cTiago |
||
| 998 |
_a20080305 _b1727^b _cTiago |
||
| 999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c25824 _d25824 |
||
| 041 | _aeng | ||