000			01785naa a2200181uu 4500
001			8030517231210
003			OSt
005			20190211163447.0
008			080305s2008 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aSTEWART, Kennedy _933758
245	1	0	_aWrite the rules and win : _bunderstanding citizen participation game dynamics
260			_aMalden, MA : _bBlackwell Publishers, _cNovember / December 2007
520	3		_aIn attempting to move beyond normative-based theories and simple descriptive accounts of extra-electoral citizen participation, this article explores the biases that are inherent in citizen participation mechanisms and proposes a model to estimate when and why different participation mechanisms might be used during "citizen participation games." Mechanism bias is explored using a matrix designed to gauge how different mechanisms afford different degrees of agenda-setting and decision-making control to citizens and state officials. Attention then turns to leadership capacity to explain the mechanisms through which teams of citizens and government officials might play their participatory games. A second matrix suggests that the choice of mechanism may vary considerably depending on whether rookie leaders are matched against other rookies, novices, or expert opponents. Though the model suggests that mechanisms affording less control to citizens are more common, it also implies that in the future, citizen players may demand mechanisms affording them more control as their leaders gain experience
773	0	8	_tPublic administration review : PAR _g67, 6, p. 1067-1076 _dMalden, MA : Blackwell Publishers, November / December 2007 _xISSN 00333352 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20080305 _b1723^b _cTiago
998			_a20080305 _b1727^b _cTiago
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c25827 _d25827
041			_aeng