000 | 01701naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 8030719024810 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211163502.0 | ||
008 | 080307s2008 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aMARKS, Jonathan _933796 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aRousseau's discriminating defense of compassion |
260 |
_aNew York : _bCambridge University Press, _cNovember 2007 |
||
520 | 3 | _aPolitical theorists from Martha Nussbaum to Amitai Etzioni appeal to compassion as a basis that liberalism otherwise lacks for refraining from exploiting and even for helping others. However, critics like Clifford Orwin and Richard Boyd have raised this question: is compassion too weak and undiscriminating to rely on in politics? Jean-Jacques Rousseau's account of compassion helps answer it. Rousseau understands compassion as a useful manifestation of the otherwise dangerous desire to extend the self and show signs of power. Consequently, he considers compassion's relative weakness a strength and explains how it can be supplemented and complemented by other, independent motives for serving others, including gratitude, friendship, and obligation. Compassion's weakness also makes it less likely than self-love, narrowly conceived, to overwhelm reason. Rousseau excels compassion's contemporary defenders in his awareness of the complex relationship between compassion and other social passions and of the dangers that his understanding of compassion addresses | |
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tAmerican Political Science Review _g101, 4, p. 727-739 _dNew York : Cambridge University Press, November 2007 _xISSN 00030554 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20080307 _b1902^b _cTiago |
||
998 |
_a20081113 _b1014^b _cZailton |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c25866 _d25866 |
||
041 | _aeng |