000 | 01835naa a2200205uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 8052316343410 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211163635.0 | ||
008 | 080523s2007 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aLINDQUIST, Stefanie A _928442 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aSupreme Court auditing of the US courts of appeals : _ban organizational perspective |
260 |
_aNew York : _bOxford University, _coct. 2007 |
||
520 | 3 | _aUsing an aggregate-level model of Supreme Court–circuit court interactions, this study assesses the extent to which the Court's auditing process of circuit court outputs is shaped by organizational dynamics such as structural capacity, institutionalization, and demographic characteristics. Principals in organizational hierarchies must audit the behavior of their agents to ensure that the agents are faithfully complying with the principals' preferences. In the case of the Supreme Court, such auditing activities must take place in the face of very limited institutional capacity on the Court's part. We propose that the Court considers certain broad organizational and institutional characteristics at the circuit level when performing this task. In particular, we find that the Court strategically allocates its limited institutional resources to audit decisions to respond to its recent interactions with individual circuits in past terms, the circuits' internal decision-making dynamics (including dissent and reversal rates), and goal conflict between the circuit and the Supreme Court | |
700 | 1 |
_aHAIRE, Susan B _934250 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aSONGER, Donald R _934251 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory - JPART _g17, 4, p. 607-624 _dNew York : Oxford University, oct. 2007 _xISSN 10531858 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20080523 _b1634^b _cTiago |
||
998 |
_a20120521 _b1036^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c26451 _d26451 |
||
041 | _aeng |