000			01607naa a2200181uu 4500
001			8052820180110
003			OSt
005			20190212111059.0
008			080528s2008 bl ||||gr |0|| 0 por d
100	1		_aVARGAS, Joana Domingues _925432
245	1	0	_aAnálise comparada do fluxo do sitema de justiça para o crime de estupro
260			_aRio de Janeiro : _bIUPERJ, _cOut./Dez. 2007
520	3		_aThe current article is intended to demonstrate the advantages of prioritizing an analysis of court caseload processing for a given type of crime and proceeding to a comparison of the results obtained from empirical studies in different countries. The article draws on a study I performed on rape cases tried by the court system in Campinas, São Paulo State, and the study by Gary LaFree on rape cases in the United States, based on data in Indianapolis, Indiana. The comparative analysis of determinants of victims' and law enforcement agencies' decisions concerning the pursuit of legal action proved to be productive, even when comparing two different systems of justice. This allowed greater knowledge of how the Brazilian criminal justice system operates, both in its capacity to identify, try, and punish sex offenders, and in terms of the importance it ascribes to formal legal rules in trying rape cases, in comparison to the American criminal justice system
773	0	8	_tDados : revista de ciências sociais _g50, 4, p. 671-697 _dRio de Janeiro : IUPERJ, Out./Dez. 2007 _xISSN 00115258 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20080528 _b2018^b _cTiago
998			_a20080528 _b2035^b _cTiago
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c26498 _d26498
041			_apor