000			01771naa a2200193uu 4500
001			8052915163410
003			OSt
005			20190211163655.0
008			080529s2008 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aBREUNIG, Christian _929387
245	1	0	_aWhat motivates the gatekeepers? explaining governing party preferences on immigration
260			_aMalden, MA : _bBlackwell Publishing, _cJanuary 2008
520	3		_aMost scholarship on immigration politics is made up of isolated case studies or cross-disciplinary work that does not build on existing political science theory. This study attempts to remedy this shortcoming in three ways: (1) we derive theories from the growing body of immigration literature, to hypothesize about why political parties would be more or less open to immigration; (2) we link these theories to the broader political science literature on parties and institutions; and (3) we construct a data set on the determinants of immigration politics, covering 18 developed countries from 1987 to 1999. Our primary hypothesis is that political institutions shape immigration politics by facilitating or constraining majoritarian sentiment (which is generally opposed to liberalizing immigration). Our analysis finds that in political systems where majoritarianism is constrained by institutional "checks," governing parties support immigration more strongly, even when controlling for a broad range of alternative explanations
700	1		_aLUEDTKE, Adam _934313
773	0	8	_tGovernance: an international journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions _g21, 1, p. 123-146 _dMalden, MA : Blackwell Publishing, January 2008 _xISSN 09521895 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20080529 _b1516^b _cTiago
998			_a20080529 _b1518^b _cTiago
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c26521 _d26521
041			_aeng