000			01654naa a2200181uu 4500
001			8060219065810
003			OSt
005			20190211163700.0
008			080602s2008 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aKOPPELL, Jonathan G. S _95688
245	1	0	_aGlobal governance organizations : _blegitimacy and authority in conflict
260			_aNew York : _bOxford University, _capr. 2008
520	3		_aGlobal governance organizations (GGOs) are frequently maligned as both illegitimate and ineffective. With the growing prominence of entities that promulgate global rules governing trade, communications, finance, and transport, these shortcomings take on greater importance. This essay presents a theoretical framework to understand the challenge of legitimacy for GGOs. It argues that GGOs tend to face trade-offs between legitimacy and authority, but that widespread usages of these important terms conflate or confuse them and thus obscure critical issues in GGO politics. Once these terms are more clearly defined, we see more easily that GGOs must sometimes violate democratic norms, sacrificing equality and bureaucratic neutrality, to satisfy key constituencies and thus retain power. The argument lays the foundation for an empirical study that demonstrates how the structure and processes adopted by GGOs are intended to satisfy the conflicting demands of legitimacy and authority
773	0	8	_tJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory - JPART _g18, 2, p. 177-203 _dNew York : Oxford University, apr. 2008 _xISSN 10531858 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20080602 _b1906^b _cTiago
998			_a20120521 _b1033^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c26534 _d26534
041			_aeng