| 000 | 01202naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 8061019532710 | ||
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20190211163712.0 | ||
| 008 | 080610s2008 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aPALANSKI, Michael E. _934502 |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aIntegrity and leadership : _bclearing the conceptual confusion |
| 260 |
_aOxford, UK : _bElsevier, _cJune 2007 |
||
| 520 | 3 | _aIntegrity is frequently used in management literature as a normative descriptor, especially with regard to leadership. The study of integrity, however, suffers from three significant problems: too many definitions, too little theory, and too few rigorous empirical studies. The purpose of this article is to attempt to address the first problem by (1) presenting a review of the definitions and uses of integrity in the management literature and (2) proposing a specific conceptualization of integrity (i.e., the consistency of an acting entitys words and actions) based on a virtue-ethics framework | |
| 700 | 1 |
_aYAMMARINO, Francis J _934503 |
|
| 773 | 0 | 8 |
_tEuropean Management Journal _g25, 3, p. 171-184 _dOxford, UK : Elsevier, June 2007 _xISSN 02632373 _w |
| 942 | _cS | ||
| 998 |
_a20080610 _b1953^b _cTiago |
||
| 999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c26638 _d26638 |
||
| 041 | _aeng | ||