000 | 01664naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 8061619071610 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211163728.0 | ||
008 | 080616s2007 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aBRODKIN, Evelyn Z _934621 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aBureaucracy redux : _bmanagement reformism and the welfare state |
260 |
_aLondon, UK : _bOxford University, _cjan. 2007 |
||
520 | 3 | _aBureaucratic discretion is a fundamental feature of social provision, one that presents enduring difficulties for management. In general, management reform has taken two, divergent paths. One, utilizing the familiar public bureaucratic model, seeks to control discretion through hierarchical command structures and standardization. The other, utilizing decentralization and privatization, regulates and relocates discretion, using incentive structures associated with market or quasi-market institutions. However, it may be that discretion will prove to be as problematic for the new public management (NPM) as it was for the old. This article offers a critical political history of management reformism, reviewing efforts to reorganize the public welfare provision by applying new public management models to old public bureaucracy problems. It considers the dynamics of bureaucratic discretion and reform not only as a problem of public management but as part of the contested politics of social policymaking | |
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory - JPART _g17, 1, p. 1-17 _dLondon, UK : Oxford University, jan. 2007 _xISSN 10531858 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20080616 _b1907^b _cTiago |
||
998 |
_a20120521 _b1048^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c26731 _d26731 |
||
041 | _aeng |