000 01502naa a2200193uu 4500
001 8061619090810
003 OSt
005 20190211163728.0
008 080616s2007 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100 1 _aBERTELLI, Anthony
_934622
245 1 0 _aStrategic appointments
260 _aLondon, UK :
_bOxford University,
_cjan. 2007
520 3 _aThis article develops an institutional spatial theory of presidential appointments to administrative agencies that falls within the spirit of a recent line of theoretical research toward an institutional theory of the presidency. We show that when bureaucrats implement policy that results from negotiation with constituents, the ally principle—appointing political allies—holds only as a knife-edge condition. Presidents are better served by appointing administrators whose preferences partially offset the influence of organized interests. The incentives described have implications for the selection of a whole range of bureaucratic personnel at various levels, generating significant implications for the study of public management on issues such as personnel administration, representative bureaucracy, and the devolution of administrative authority
700 1 _aFELDMANN, Sven E
_934623
773 0 8 _tJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory - JPART
_g17, 1, p. 19-38
_dLondon, UK : Oxford University, jan. 2007
_xISSN 10531858
_w
942 _cS
998 _a20080616
_b1909^b
_cTiago
998 _a20120521
_b1048^b
_cCarolina
999 _aConvertido do Formato PHL
_bPHL2MARC21 1.1
_c26732
_d26732
041 _aeng