000			01756naa a2200181uu 4500
001			8061619183910
003			OSt
005			20220329172313.0
008			080616s2007 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_934626 _aWeible, Christopher M.
245	1	0	_aAn Advocacy coalition framework approach to stakeholder analysis : _bunderstanding the political context of California marine protected area policy
260			_aLondon, UK : _bOxford University, _cjan. 2007
520	3		_aThere is a growing recognition that public policy controversies are driven more by value differences than by technical deficiencies. Unfortunately, we have yet to develop, test, and refine systematic approaches for understanding political systems. In this article I explain how the advocacy coalition framework (ACF) can be used as a theoretical basis for understanding political context via a stakeholder analysis. An ACF stakeholder analysis widens the attention of policy analysts toward subsystem-wide dynamics with multiple actors who are motivated by their beliefs, structure their relationships into advocacy coalitions, and try to influence policy through utilizing multiple resources and venues. I illustrate an ACF approach to stakeholder analysis in a scientifically contentious political conflict over the establishment of marine protected areas in California. I conclude with a summary of contributions to the ACF literature and the strengths and limitations of conducting an ACF stakeholder analysis
773	0	8	_tJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory - JPART _g17, 1, p. 95-117 _dLondon, UK : Oxford University, jan. 2007 _xISSN 10531858 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20080616 _b1918^b _cTiago
998			_a20120521 _b1049^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c26736 _d26736
041			_aeng