| 000 | 01732naa a2200169uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 8061820144510 | ||
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20190211163758.0 | ||
| 008 | 080618s2008 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aMONTPETIT, Éric _97387 |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aPolicy design for legitimacy : _bexpert knowledge, citizens, time and inclusion in the United Kingdom's biotechnology sector |
| 260 |
_aMalden, MA : _bBlackwell Publishers, _cMarch 2008 |
||
| 520 | 3 | _aMore than ever, policy designers need to take legitimacy deficits seriously. To do so, they increasingly involve citizens in policy design processes and draw from a wider range of expertise. Where should they stop in terms of inclusiveness to citizens and expertise and for how long should they allow citizens and experts to be persuasive? These are the questions addressed in this article. Policy design legitimacy, the article argues, can be related to variations in designers and politicians inclination to resort to output-oriented (expertise-based) versus input-oriented (citizen-centred) design processes. Input-oriented processes have a higher potential in terms of legitimacy deficit reduction than output-oriented processes, but they take longer, notably because they require the involvement of large numbers of people. In contrast, output-oriented processes have a slightly lower legitimacy potential, but can produce it faster. These propositions are illustrated by two policy design narratives drawn from the United Kingdoms biotechnology sector | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 |
_tPublic administration : an international quarterly _g86, 1, p. 259-277 _dMalden, MA : Blackwell Publishers, March 2008 _xISSN 14679299 _w |
| 942 | _cS | ||
| 998 |
_a20080618 _b2014^b _cTiago |
||
| 999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c26787 _d26787 |
||
| 041 | _aeng | ||