000			01290naa a2200169uu 4500
001			8061915171810
003			OSt
005			20190211163805.0
008			080619s2008 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aSHOCH, James _934698
245	1	0	_aBringing public opinion and electoral politics back in : _bexplaining the fate of "Clintonomics" and its contemporary relevance
260			_aLondon : _bSage Publications, _cMarch 2008
520	3		_aIn 1992, Bill Clinton won the presidency committed to an ambitious program of "public investment." Yet the plan Clinton submitted to the Democrat-controlled Congress in early 1993 was sharply scaled back in favor of an emphasis on reducing the federal budget deficit. Congress then made further deep cuts in Clinton's plan. This Democratic retreat from public investment would continue throughout the remainder of Clinton's presidency. In this article, I argue that the fate of "Clintonomics" was due mainly to public opinion and electoral politics. In an epilogue, I examine the implications of this episode for the new intra-Democratic debate over public investment
773	0	8	_tPolitics & Society _g36, 1, p. 89-130 _dLondon : Sage Publications, March 2008 _xISSN 00323292 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20080619 _b1517^b _cTiago
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c26799 _d26799
041			_aeng