000			01658naa a2200181uu 4500
001			8062418580110
003			OSt
005			20190211163835.0
008			080624s2008 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aGRAFF, Samantha K. _934778
245	1	0	_aFirst amendment implications of restricting food an beverage marketing in schools
260			_aThousand Oaks : _bSAGE, _cJanuary 2008
520	3		_aThis article explores how the First Amendment bears upon a school district policy restricting junk food and soda marketing in public schools. The article highlights a clash between two fundamental American beliefs: that a public school should be a sheltered training ground for democratic citizenship and that the strength of the free market economy is dependent upon corporate access to consumers including children. The article begins by describing the "commercial speech doctrine," which explains why the First Amendment might be implicated in a school district advertising policy. The article then touches on actions a school district might take without involving the First Amendment. Next, the article distinguishes between two First Amendment standards of review that a court could apply to a school district advertising policy and argues that a "forum analysis" is the appropriate approach. The article identifies three types of advertising policies that should survive a forum analysis
773	0	8	_tThe Annals of The American Academy of Political and Social Science _g615, p. 158-177 _dThousand Oaks : SAGE, January 2008 _xISSN 00027162 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20080624 _b1858^b _cTiago
998			_a20100624 _b1029^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c26851 _d26851
041			_aeng