000			01428naa a2200181uu 4500
001			8070719391910
003			OSt
005			20190211163903.0
008			080707s2008 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aREED, Christine _934832
245	1	0	_aWild horse protection policies : _benvironmental and animal ethics in transition
260			_aPhiladelphia : _bRoutledge, _cFebruary 2008
520	3		_aWild horse protection policies in the United States and the Netherlands reflect ethical claims and scientific arguments, often cast as opposing positions favoring the integrity of self-sustaining ecosystems versus the welfare of individual animals. Neither holistic eco-centric, nor individualistic bio-centric ethical claims provide guidance to public sector practitioners who care for wild horses removed from U.S. public rangelands and living in holding facilities awaiting adoption; or who manage herds of de-domesticated horses in Dutch nature reserves. Wild horses are becoming increasingly dependent on transitional environments that are neither wild nor domestic. New ethical and scientific arguments are therefore needed to support revisions to existing policies
773	0	8	_tInternational Journal of Public Administration - IJPA _g31, 3, p. 277-286 _dPhiladelphia : Routledge, February 2008 _xISSN 01900692 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20080707 _b1939^b _cTiago
998			_a20100723 _b1104^b _cDaiane
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c26907 _d26907
041			_aeng