000 | 01857naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 8073114233810 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211164101.0 | ||
008 | 080731s2008 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aEZROW, Lawrence _935229 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aPartie's policy programmes and the dog that didn't bark : _bno evidene that proportional systems promote extreme party positioning |
260 |
_aCambridge, UK : _bCambridge University Press, _cJuly 2008 |
||
520 | 3 | _aThere is extensive theoretical research that explores the linkages between parties' policy positions, on the one hand, and the characteristics of the political system (i.e. voting rules and the number of parties) on the other, but empirical research on this topic is less developed. Building on earlier work by Jay Dow, this article reports empirical analyses exploring the connections between the average party policy extremism in fifteen party systems (defined as the average party policy distance from the party system centre), and two important system-level variables: the proportionality of the electoral laws used to select representatives to the national legislature, and the number of political parties. Contrary to expectations but consistent with recent theoretical work by Norman Schofield and his co-authors no evidence is found that average party policy extremism increases under proportional representation, nor that policy extremism increases in countries that feature large numbers of parties. These findings have important implications for political representation and for understanding parties' election strategies | |
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tBritish journal of political science _g38, 3, p. 479-497 _dCambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press, July 2008 _xISSN 00071234 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20080731 _b1423^b _cTiago |
||
998 |
_a20081028 _b1010^b _cZailton |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c27174 _d27174 |
||
041 | _aeng |