000			01378naa a2200181uu 4500
001			8082216304810
003			OSt
005			20190211164211.0
008			080822s2008 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aFONG, Eric A. _935423
245	1	0	_aEffort, performance, and conscientiousness : _ban agency theory perspective
260			_aLondon, UK : _bSage Publications, _cApril 2007
520	3		_aThe authors examine the moderating effects of conscientiousness on the relationships between agency controls and effort and agency controls and task performance. Results show that less conscientious individuals appear to increase effort through incentive alignment and monitoring, whereas conscientious individuals do not shirk with or without agency controls. Furthermore, results show that less conscientious individuals increase task performance through incentive alignment, but not through monitoring. The study confirms that motivation to act opportunistically differs between individuals unlike what is assumed by agency theory. Also, incentive alignment may be more effective than monitoring when attempting to align principal and agent interests
700	1		_aTOSI JR., Henry L _929124
773	0	8	_tJournal of Management : J.O.M _g33, 2, p. 161-179 _dLondon, UK : Sage Publications, April 2007 _xISSN 01492063 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20080822 _b1630^b _cTiago
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c27343 _d27343
041			_aeng