000			01426naa a2200193uu 4500
001			8082216332210
003			OSt
005			20190211164212.0
008			080822s2008 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aSTEEL, Robert P. _935424
245	1	0	_aTimeframes and absence frameworks : _ba test of steers and rhodes' (1978) model of attendance
260			_aLondon, UK : _bSage Publications, _cApril 2007
520	3		_aSteers and Rhodes' (1978) model of employee attendance encompasses a variety of absence-predictor types (e.g., attitudes, personal factors, etc.). Recent conceptual frameworks suggest that the inconsistent findings on this model may be attributable, in part, to the use of absence timeframes that are incompatible with individual model components. Using data from 580 federal employees, a predictive analysis evaluated exogenous model predictors against absence criteria representing four different cumulation periods. Supplemental analysis explored the possibility of incremental endogenous-variable (i.e., Ability to Attend, Motivation to Attend) contributions. Results of both tests were consistent with a conclusion of partial model support
700	1		_aRENTSCH, Joan R. _935425
700	1		_aVAN SCOTTER, James R _935426
773	0	8	_tJournal of Management : J.O.M _g33, 2, p. 180-195 _dLondon, UK : Sage Publications, April 2007 _xISSN 01492063 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20080822 _b1633^b _cTiago
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c27344 _d27344
041			_aeng