000			01447naa a2200193uu 4500
001			8082216375710
003			OSt
005			20190211164213.0
008			080822s2008 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aMERO, Neal P. _935430
245	1	0	_aAccountability in a performance appraisal context : _bthe effect of audience and form of accounting on rater response and behavior
260			_aLondon, UK : _bSage Publications, _cApril 2007
520	3		_aThis study explored how context influences accountability in a performance appraisal context. Results demonstrate that audience characteristics influence rating quality, as raters accountable to higher status or mixed-status audiences provided more accurate ratings, whereas those accountable to a lower status audience provided more inflated ratings. Participant note taking also mediated the relationship between accountability to higher status or mixed-status audiences and rating accuracy. Raters required to account for ratings in person as opposed to in writing were more accurate when accountable to higher status or mixed audiences and provided more positive indicators of behavior when accountable to a lower status audience
700	1		_aGUIDICE, Rebecca M. _935431
700	1		_aBROWNLEE, Amy L _935432
773	0	8	_tJournal of Management : J.O.M _g33, 2, p. 223-252 _dLondon, UK : Sage Publications, April 2007 _xISSN 01492063 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20080822 _b1637^b _cTiago
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c27346 _d27346
041			_aeng