000 | 01986naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 8091215042510 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211164226.0 | ||
008 | 080912s2008 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aHIRSCHMANN, Nancy J _935508 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aMill, political economy, and women's work |
260 |
_aNew York, NY : _bCambridge University Press, _cMay 2008 |
||
520 | 3 | _aThe sexual division of labor and the social and economic value of women's work in the home has been a problem that scholars have struggled with at least since the advent of the second wave women's movement, but it has never entered into the primary discourses of political science. This paper argues that John Stuart Mill's Political Economy provides innovative and useful arguments that address this thorny problem. Productive labor is essential to Mill's conception of property, and property was vital to women's independence in Mill's view. Yet since Mill thought most women would choose the career of wife and mother rather than working for wages, then granting that work productive status would provide a radical and inventive foundation for women's equality. Mill, however, is ambiguous about the productive status of domestic labor, and is thereby representative of a crucial failure in political economic thought, as well as in egalitarian liberal thought on gender. But because Mill at the same time develops a conception of production that goes well beyond the narrow limits offered by other prominent political economists, he offers contemporary political scientists and theorists a way to rethink the relationship of reproductive to productive labor, the requirements for gender equality, and the accepted categories of political economy | |
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tAmerican Political Science Review _g102, 2, p. 199-214 _dNew York, NY : Cambridge University Press, May 2008 _xISSN 00030554 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20080912 _b1504^b _cTiago |
||
998 |
_a20081111 _b1508^b _cZailton |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c27468 _d27468 |
||
041 | _aeng |