000 | 01431naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 8091216554110 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211164237.0 | ||
008 | 080912s2008 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aROSS, Michael L _935524 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aOil, islam, and women |
260 |
_aNew York, NY : _bCambridge University Press, _cFebruary 2008 |
||
520 | 3 | _aWomen have made less progress toward gender equality in the Middle East than in any other region. Many observers claim this is due to the region's Islamic traditions. I suggest that oil, not Islam, is at fault; and that oil production also explains why women lag behind in many other countries. Oil production reduces the number of women in the labor force, which in turn reduces their political influence. As a result, oil-producing states are left with atypically strong patriarchal norms, laws, and political institutions. I support this argument with global data on oil production, female work patterns, and female political representation, and by comparing oil-rich Algeria to oil-poor Morocco and Tunisia. This argument has implications for the study of the Middle East, Islamic culture, and the resource curse | |
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tAmerican Political Science Review _g102, 1, p. 107-124 _dNew York, NY : Cambridge University Press, February 2008 _xISSN 00030554 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20080912 _b1655^b _cTiago |
||
998 |
_a20081113 _b1025^b _cZailton |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c27481 _d27481 |
||
041 | _aeng |