000			01595naa a2200181uu 4500
001			8091814342110
003			OSt
005			20190211164310.0
008			080918s2008 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aVACHUDOVA, Milada A _935581
245	1	0	_aTempered by the EU? : _bpolitical parties and party systems before and after accession
260			_aOxfordshire, UK : _bTaylor & Francis, _cSeptember 2008
520	3		_aParty systems of European Union (EU) candidate states follow a predictable evolution over time. Before negotiations begin, most major political parties respond to EU leverage by adopting agendas that are consistent with qualifying for membership. Consequently, the party systems - at least for a while - reflect a consensus on the direction of domestic policy-making. Candidate states where regime change in 1989 was followed by illiberal democracy or authoritarianism are the most interesting. For key parties in these states, pushing for EU accession is a marker of profound moderation in their agendas. Yet after EU accession, the parameters for party competition broaden again. The lifting of accession-related constraints is especially apparent among parties that adopt more nationalist and culturally conservative positions. However, preliminary evidence suggests that such parties have made only modest political gains
773	0	8	_tJournal of European Public Policy _g15, 6, p. 861-879 _dOxfordshire, UK : Taylor & Francis, September 2008 _xISSN 13501763 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20080918 _b1434^b _cTiago
998			_a20100614 _b1705^b _cceleste
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c27556 _d27556
041			_aeng