000			01446naa a2200193uu 4500
001			8101319451010
003			OSt
005			20190211164340.0
008			081013s2007 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aKNIJN, Trudie _933322
245	1	0	_aContested professionalism : _bpayments for care and the quality of home care
260			_aThousand Oaks : _bSAGE, _cJuly 2007
520	3		_aIn the recent past, policy makers have emphasized the benefits and positive aspects of direct payments for care of frail elderly people. In this article, the authors present the theoretical framework of "struggling logics of home care," by means of which they explore the underlying logics of the introduction of payments for care: market, family, and state. More specifically, the authors show the strengths and weaknesses of a fourth logic—professionalism—and expound how this logic is submitted to marketized and familialized payments for care. The authors conclude that there are indeed some positive aspects of the trend toward payments for care. However, (female) professional home care workers benefit hardly at all. On the long term, this could also erode the quality of care provided to recipients
700	1		_aVERHAGEN, Stijn _935654
773	0	8	_tAdministration & Society _g39, 4, p. 451-473 _dThousand Oaks : SAGE, July 2007 _xISSN 00953997 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20081013 _b1945^b _cTiago
998			_a20100719 _b1638^b _cDaiane
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c27636 _d27636
041			_aeng