000 | 01324naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 8101320141810 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211164344.0 | ||
008 | 081013s2007 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aKEELER, Rebecca L. _935656 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aAnalysis of logic : _bcategories of people in U.S. HIV/Aids policy |
260 |
_aThousand Oaks : _bSAGE, _cSeptember 2007 |
||
520 | 3 | _aPublic policies are replete with category structures meant to sort and count target populations. This article analyzes categories for HIV risk exposure of U.S. federal policy beneficiaries. Close examination of the category scheme reveals that the categories are not perfectly logical or consistent. Furthermore, changing demographics of the affected population suggests focus should be on differently defined categories. Continued usage of the existing categories may be hindering more effective policy response to the changing demographics of HIV. This article applies Yanow's race and ethnic category analysis in a new context, further illustrating the implications of category definitions in public policies | |
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tAdministration & Society _g39, 5, p. 612-630 _dThousand Oaks : SAGE, September 2007 _xISSN 00953997 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20081013 _b2014^b _cTiago |
||
998 |
_a20100805 _b1516^b _cCarolina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c27642 _d27642 |
||
041 | _aeng |