000			01672naa a2200169uu 4500
001			8103115045410
003			OSt
005			20190211164402.0
008			081031s2008 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aGALE, Fred _935698
245	1	0	_aTasmania's Tamar Valley Pulp Mill : _ba comparison of planning processes using a good environmental governance framework
260			_aBrisbane Queensland : _bBlackwell Publishing, _cSeptember 2008
520	3		_aIn November 2004, the Tasmanian government requested the state's planning body, the Resource Planning and Development Commission (RPDC), to undertake an evaluation of a proposal to establish a pulp mill at Long Reach near Bell Bay on Tasmania's Tamar Estuary. In early 2007, Gunns Limited, the project's proponent, pulled out of the RPDC process and the government established an alternative, 'fast-track' process under the Pulp Mill Assessment Act (PMAA). This article evaluates the RPDC and the PMAA assessment processes using a 'good environmental governance' framework composed of eight criteria – transparency, accountability, openness, balance, deliberation, efficiency, science and risk. The comparison reveals that although the RPDC process fell short of the ideal, it was markedly superior to the PMAA process that replaced it. The case highlights how political economic power can be used to the detriment of public planning and the communities and environment that rely on it
773	0	8	_tAustralian Journal of Public Administration : AJPA _g67, 3, p. 261-282 _dBrisbane Queensland : Blackwell Publishing, September 2008 _xISSN 03136647 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20081031 _b1504^b _cTiago
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c27699 _d27699
041			_aeng