000 | 03574nam a2200337uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 8103115210213 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20240719063019.0 | ||
008 | 081031s2004 xx ||||g| |0|| 0 eng d | ||
020 | _a184542591X | ||
090 |
_a4.05 _bC7648c |
||
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aControlling modern government : _bvariety, commonality and change |
260 |
_aCheltenham : _bEdward Elgar, _c2004 |
||
300 | _a220 p. | ||
505 | 8 | 0 |
_t- Part I - Introduction _t1. Controlling public services and government: towards a cross-national perspective - Christopher Hood _t- Part II - Control over government in theree domains _t2. Prisons: varying oversight and mutuality, much tinkering limited control _t2.1 Overview - Oliver James and Christopher Hood _t2.2 Japan: hierarchically ordered mutuality in a semi-hidden world - Takashi Nishio _t2.3 US federal prisons: bureau family mutuality in the 'government of strangers' - Arjen Boin and Oliver James _t2.4 England and wales: combining oversight with public-private competition - Oliver James _t2.5 Germany: tinkering with oversight and mutuality in a legalistic state tradition - Martin Lodge _t2.6 France: ineffective oversight in the land of inspections générales - Marie Vogel _t2.7 The netherlands: a professional mutuality/oversight hybrid under pressure - Arjen Boin _t2.8 Norway: a stable oversight/mutuality hybrid amid limited diversification of professional mutuality - Per Laergreid and Marjoleine H. Wik _t2.9 Australia: variety in reforms to oversight alongside increased public-private competition - Colin Scott _t3. Higher education and university research: harnessing competition and mutuality to oversight? _t3.1 Overview - Colin Scott and Christopher Hood _t3.2 The USA: little oversight, no explosion - B. Guy Peters _t3.3 Japan: adapting the American model to centralized oversight - Katsyua Hirose _t3.4 France: mutuality and oversight in tension? - Nicole de Montricher _t3.5 Germany: growing competition at the expense of mutuality - Hans-Ulrich Derlien _t3.6 The netherlands: a mixed patterm of control - Jeroen Huisman and theo Toonen _t3.7 Norway: holding back competition? - Ivar Bleiklie _t3.8 Australia: linking oversight to mutuality and competition - Collin Scott _t3.9 The UK: hyper-regulation and regulatory reform - Colin Scott _t4. Higher civil servants: neither mutuality impolsion nor oversight explosion _t4.1 Overview - B. Guy Peters and Christopher Hood _t4.2 The USA: higt on oversight, low on mutuality? - B. Guy Peters _t4.3 Japan: Where mutuality reigns supreme? - Takashi Nishio _t4.4 France: high mutuality, some randomness, weak oversight - Nicole de Montricher _t4.5 Germany: village life becoming more complicated - Hans-Ulrich Derlien _t4.6 The netherlands: edging away from pure mutuality? - Theo Toon and Frits M. van der Meer _t4.7 Norway: managerialism and parliamentary oversight in lock-step? - Per Laergreid _t4.8 The UK and Australia: two westminster-model states compared - Christopher Hood and Colin Scott _t- Part III - Conclusions _t5. Conclusion: marking sense of controls over government - Christopher Hood |
650 | 4 |
_aGovernabilidade _911939 |
|
650 | 4 |
_912780 _aServiço Público |
|
650 | 4 |
_aGovernança _911938 |
|
651 | 4 |
_aEuropa _912887 |
|
651 | 4 |
_aJapão _913197 |
|
651 | 4 |
_aEstados Unidos _912942 |
|
651 | 4 |
_aAustrália _912933 |
|
700 | 1 |
_a _935701 |
|
700 | 1 |
_98362 _a Peters ,B. Guy (Ed.) |
|
700 | 1 |
_a _913787 |
|
942 | _cG | ||
998 |
_a20081031 _b1521^b _cmayze |
||
998 |
_a20130617 _b1147^b _ckarina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c27704 _d27704 |
||
041 | _aeng |