000 | 01623naa a2200193uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 9011218390910 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211164453.0 | ||
008 | 090112s2009 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aSONG, Weiqing _935849 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aEurosceptics and Europhiles in accord : _bthe creation of the european onbudsman as an institutional isomorphism |
260 |
_aBristol, UK : _bThe Policy Press, _cOctober 2008 |
||
520 | 3 | _aThe creation of the European Ombudsman (EO) in the Treaty on the European Union (EU) was largely an initiative of the Spanish and Danish governments. Concerned with the problem of democratic legitimacy of the EU system, the two countries proposed the ombudsman plan from their own national experiences. However, their motivations differed. The Spanish plan was directly linked with its ambition of European citizenship whereas the Danish proposal was concerned with bureaucratic control of the Community institutions; thus, 'two different diseases, the same remedy'. Equipped with the theory of institutional isomorphism (a process of organisational homogenisation), it is argued that for the integrationists, the creation of an ombudsman at the European level is 'moving forward', or an expansive approach to the EU legitimacy problem, whereas for the anti-Europeanists, it is a 'fencing off', or a constrictive EU approach | |
700 | 1 |
_aDELLA SALA, Vincent _935850 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tPolicy & Politics _g36, 4, p. 481-495 _dBristol, UK : The Policy Press, October 2008 _xISSN 03055736 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20090112 _b1839^b _cTiago |
||
998 |
_a20111104 _b1645^b _cGeisneer |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c27887 _d27887 |
||
041 | _aeng |