000			01812naa a2200181uu 4500
001			9012617292510
003			OSt
005			20190211164559.0
008			090126s2009 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aKEMSHALL, Hazel _936019
245	1	0	_aRisk and public protection : _bresponding to involuntary and 'taboo' risk
260			_aMalden, MA : _bWiley-Blackwell, _cDecember 2008
520	3		_aGrowing media, political and public concern with high-risk offenders in the community has focused policy attention on the concept of 'public protection'. A notion that the public has the right to be protected, particularly from 'monstrous' offenders such as predatory paedophiles, has infiltrated much recent legislation and penal policy. This article will explore the critical factors in the 'public protection' trend and the framing of risk and risky offenders that has ensued. In particular, attention will be given to the new surveillance and intervention mechanisms under the Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA) and whether these arrangements manage risk or displace it. To what extent are they driven by the 'precautionary principle' and defensive responses to risks that are over-inflated? To what extent does this result in 'perverse incentives' to over-manage certain risks and to over-concentrate on restrictive risk management techniques such as electronic tagging, satellite surveillance and curfews rather than treatment? Does the system represent effective risk management or a system for dealing with risk anxiety – both of the public(s) and of politicians?
700	1		_aWOOD, Jason _936020
773	0	8	_tSocial policy & administration _g42, 6, p. 611-629 _dMalden, MA : Wiley-Blackwell, December 2008 _xISSN 01445596 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20090126 _b1729^b _cTiago
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c28049 _d28049
041			_aeng