| 000 | 01394naa a2200181uu 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 9012713485010 | ||
| 003 | OSt | ||
| 005 | 20190211164612.0 | ||
| 008 | 090127s2009 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 | 1 |
_aBAILEY, Michael A. _924425 |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aDoes legal doctrine matter? : _bunpacking law and policy preferences on the U.S. Supreme Court |
| 260 |
_aNew York, NY : _bCambridge University Press, _cAugust 2008 |
||
| 520 | 3 | _aJudicial scholars often struggle to disentangle the effects of law and policy preferences on U.S. Supreme Court decision making. We employ a new approach to measuring the effectif anyof the law on justices' decisions. We use positions taken on Supreme Court cases by members of Congress and presidents to identify policy components of voting. Doing so enables us to isolate the effects of three legal doctrines: adherence to precedent, judicial restraint, and a strict interpretation of the First Amendment's protection of speech clause. We find considerable evidence that legal factors play an important role in Supreme Court decision making. We also find that the effect of legal factors varies across justices | |
| 700 | 1 |
_aMALTZMAN, Forrest _96549 |
|
| 773 | 0 | 8 |
_tAmerican political science review _g102, 3, p. 369-384 _dNew York, NY : Cambridge University Press, August 2008 _xISSN 00030554 _w |
| 942 | _cS | ||
| 998 |
_a20090127 _b1348^b _cTiago |
||
| 999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c28073 _d28073 |
||
| 041 | _aeng | ||