000			01611naa a2200169uu 4500
001			9022615162210
003			OSt
005			20190211164808.0
008			090226s2009 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aINGRAM, James D _936400
245	1	0	_aWhat is a "right to have rights"? : _bthree images of the politics of human rights
260			_aNew York, NY : _bCambridge University Press, _cNovember 2008
520	3		_aThis article seeks to elucidate some of the difficulties and reversals that afflict human rights by exploring three interpretations of Hannah Arendt's idea of a “right to have rights,” and in particular the images of politics these interpretations presuppose. The first, most conventional interpretation considers this right in terms of the use of power to implement rights; a second, broadly Kantian interpretation understands it in terms of laws and institutions; a third, which I develop through an original reading of Arendt, bases it on the activity of the rights-claimants or -holders themselves. Although each of these conceptions corresponds to different circumstances and speaks to different concerns, the third is especially valuable in helping us understand the problems that plague efforts on behalf of human rights and showing how human rights can best be realized and secured. If it is the most demanding, it alone fully honors human rights' emphasis on autonomy
773	0	8	_tAmerican political science review _g102, 4, p. 401-416 _dNew York, NY : Cambridge University Press, November 2008 _xISSN 00030554 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20090226 _b1516^b _cTiago
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c28382 _d28382
041			_aeng