000			01976naa a2200169uu 4500
001			9022616312410
003			OSt
005			20190211164814.0
008			090226s2009 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aLIPSON, Daniel S _936417
245	1	0	_aWhere's the Justice? : _baffirmative action's severed civil rights roots in the age of diversity
260			_aNew York, NY : _bCambridge University Press, _cDecember 2008
520	3		_aThe institutionalization of race-conscious inclusion policies in employment, education, and contracting has largely endured in post-civil rights America despite predictions of their demise. However, scholarship has continued to mislabel many of the specific policies in these organizations and governments as “affirmative action” policies, even though many such policies lack the civil rights roots necessary to warrant this label. In this article, I explain how many organizations have recast, supplemented, or replaced their rights-based affirmative action policies with utilitarian diversity policies. While the conventional, civil rights framework for analyzing affirmative action obscures the rise of such organizational diversity policies, an alternative body of scholarship that employs a diversity framework has shed light on the causes, content, and consequences of this policy and political realignment. The Supreme Court's 2003 Grutter v. Bollinger decision and the political activism surrounding Michigan's Proposal 2 in 2006 both exemplify the trademark signs of this shift from rights-based affirmative action to organizational diversity policies. The article concludes by assessing the promise and dangers of this trend of rooting racial inclusion policies in a utilitarian diversity logic rather than a civil rights logic
773	0	8	_tPerspectives on politics _g6, 4, p. 691-706 _dNew York, NY : Cambridge University Press, December 2008 _xISSN 15375927 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20090226 _b1631^b _cTiago
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c28397 _d28397
041			_aeng