000			01506naa a2200193uu 4500
001			9031915083910
003			OSt
005			20190211164843.0
008			090319s2009 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aBURKE, Brendan F. _923335
245	1	0	_aContinuity and change in executive leadership : _binsights from the perspectives of state administrators
260			_aMalden, MA : _bBlackwell Publishers, _cDecember 2008
520	3		_aExecutive leadership in state government is examined at two levels, both from the perspectives of the heads of state administrative agencies responding to mail question surveys in 1994, 1998, and 2004. At one level, the status and strength of the governor in controlling and leading the executive branch are assessed. At the second (agency) level, state executives (and their agencies) are assessed on four criteria that are connected, directly or indirectly, with the aims of the Winter Commission: leadership, responsiveness, reforms (at the agency level), and performance (through contracting). State administration generally reflects a balance between continuity and change, with more of the former at the gubernatorial (and legislative) level, and more of the latter at the state agency level
700	1		_aCHO, Chung-Lae _923952
700	1		_aWRIGHT, Deil S _917262
773	0	8	_tPublic administration review : PAR _g68, Special, p. S29-S36 _dMalden, MA : Blackwell Publishers, December 2008 _xISSN 00333352 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20090319 _b1508^b _cTiago
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c28556 _d28556
041			_aeng