000			01798naa a2200205uu 4500
001			9052014490730
003			OSt
005			20190211164935.0
008			090520s2009 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aJOYCE, Philip G _916638
245	1	0	_aCongressional budget reform : _bthe unanticipated implications for federal policy making
260			_aMalden, MA : _bBlackwell Publishers, _cjul./aug. 1996
520	3		_aWhat have been the long-term impacts of the 1974 Congressional Budget and improundment act? These 20-plus years have seen fundamental changes to the congressional budget proces. Many of these changes have had profounf - and unanticipated - changes for policy making. The author reviews these changes and discusses their implications> He finds theree main developments that have not received adequate scrutiny. Firts, the reconciliation process, almost an afterthought in 1974, has in many ways become the most important part of the process because of its ability to centralize decision making and force committees to take action. Second, while the original budget act in 1990, have attempted to use the process to drive policy autcomes. Third, the expanded importance of budget enforcement has led to a great potencial for distortions as policies are consider if and when the congressional budget process is revised again. In particular, history shows us that the process is better at informing budget choices than prescribing them.
590			_aPublic administration review PAR
590			_aJuly/August 1996 volume 56 numero 4
773	0	8	_tPublic administration review : PAR _g56, 4, p. 317-325 _dMalden, MA : Blackwell Publishers, jul./aug. 1996 _xISSN 00333352 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20090520 _b1449^b _cIlkia
998			_a20090520 _b1527^b _cIlkia
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c29157 _d29157
041			_aeng