000			01791naa a2200205uu 4500
001			9052017571530
003			OSt
005			20190211164940.0
008			090520s2009 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aLEE, D. Robert _936981
245	1	0	_aFederal employees, torts, and the westfall act of 1988
260			_aMalden, MA : _bBlackwell Publishers, _cjul./aug. 1996
520	3		_aWhat have been the implications of the 1988 Federal employess Liability reform and tort compensation act? The estfall act was pased in 1988 to re-immunize federal workers from suits in common law tort, such as negligence. The act was passed to overturn a Supreme court decision that caused a crisis affecting employees in all theree branches of government. The law accomplished its main purpose but also has led to a set of new issues. Federal courts are in disagreement over the process by which the attorney general may transform a suit from being ano against an individual to one this certification process is possible. Experience with the law involves doctrines about legislative intent, delegation of powers, and exhaustion of administrative remedies. For both those bringing suits and those being sued, the process is frustrating in that extended delays may occur while the courts determine in what court a case should be heard - federal district court or a state court - and who the defendant should be - the federal government or the federal employee.
590			_aPublic administration review PAR
590			_aJuly/August 1996 volume 56 numero 4
773	0	8	_tPublic administration review : PAR _g56, 4, p. 334-340 _dMalden, MA : Blackwell Publishers, jul./aug. 1996 _xISSN 00333352 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20090520 _b1757^b _cIlkia
998			_a20090608 _b1555^b _cIlkia
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c29169 _d29169
041			_aeng