000			01707naa a2200193uu 4500
001			9052110114313
003			OSt
005			20220414084422.0
008			090521s2009 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 d
100	1		_913328 _aFrederickson, H. George
245	1	0	_aComparing the reiventing government movement with the new public administration
260			_aMalden, MA : _bBlackwell Publishers, _cmay/june 1996
520	3		_aIn this article the reinventing government movenment is compared with the new public administration along six dimensions. A strongly felt need to change bureucracy differently. Boht movements seek relevance and responsiveness, but in different ways, Issues of rationality, methodology, and epistemology are more important in the new public administration than in the reiventing government movement. Both movements conceptualize organization similarly. The reiventing government movement has a stronger commitment to market approaches for the provision of public services and to mechanisms for individualchoice. Reiventing government is popular electoral politics for executives (presidents, governors, mayors)and is more radical than new public administration. The new public administration prompted subtle, incremental shifts toward democratic management practices and social equity. The results of reiventing government, so far, are short-run increases in efficiency and social equity.
590			_aPublic administration review PAR
590			_aMay/June 1996 Volume 56 Number 3
773	0	8	_tPublic administration review: PAR _g56, 3, p. 263-270 _dMalden, MA : Blackwell Publishers, may/june 1996 _xISSN 00333352 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20090521 _b1011^b _cmayze
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c29175 _d29175
041			_aeng