000 01614naa a2200193uu 4500
001 9052116335419
003 OSt
005 20210820190409.0
008 090521s2009 bl ||||gr |0|| 0 por d
100 1 _91455
_aBresser-Pereira, Luiz Carlos
245 1 0 _aOs dois métodos e o núcleo duro da teoria econômica
260 _aSão Paulo :
_bEditora 34,
_cabr./jun. 2009
520 3 _aThe two methods and the hard core of economics. While methodological sciences have no object and are supposed to adopt a hypothetical-deductive method, substantive sciences including economics should use an empirical or historical-deductive method. The great classical economists and Keynes did that and were able to develop open models explaining how equally open economic systems work. Thus, the hard core of relevant economics is formed by the classical microeconomics and the classical theory of capitalist economic growth, and by Keynesian macroeconomics. In contrast, neoclassical economist aiming to build a mathematical science wrongly adopted the hypothetical-deductive method, and came to macroeconomic and growth models that do not have practical use in policymaking. The exception is Marshall’s microeconomics that does not provide a model of real economic systems, but is useful to the analysis of markets
590 _av. 29, n. 2(114)
773 0 8 _tRevista Economia Política = Brazilian Journal of Political Economy
_g29, 2, p. 163-190
_dSão Paulo : Editora 34, abr./jun. 2009
_xISSN 01013157
_w
942 _cS
998 _a20090521
_b1633^b
_cMariana
998 _a20140306
_b0927^b
_ckarina
999 _aConvertido do Formato PHL
_bPHL2MARC21 1.1
_c29210
_d29210
041 _apor