000 | 01614naa a2200193uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 9052116335419 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20210820190409.0 | ||
008 | 090521s2009 bl ||||gr |0|| 0 por d | ||
100 | 1 |
_91455 _aBresser-Pereira, Luiz Carlos |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aOs dois métodos e o núcleo duro da teoria econômica |
260 |
_aSão Paulo : _bEditora 34, _cabr./jun. 2009 |
||
520 | 3 | _aThe two methods and the hard core of economics. While methodological sciences have no object and are supposed to adopt a hypothetical-deductive method, substantive sciences including economics should use an empirical or historical-deductive method. The great classical economists and Keynes did that and were able to develop open models explaining how equally open economic systems work. Thus, the hard core of relevant economics is formed by the classical microeconomics and the classical theory of capitalist economic growth, and by Keynesian macroeconomics. In contrast, neoclassical economist aiming to build a mathematical science wrongly adopted the hypothetical-deductive method, and came to macroeconomic and growth models that do not have practical use in policymaking. The exception is Marshalls microeconomics that does not provide a model of real economic systems, but is useful to the analysis of markets | |
590 | _av. 29, n. 2(114) | ||
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tRevista Economia Política = Brazilian Journal of Political Economy _g29, 2, p. 163-190 _dSão Paulo : Editora 34, abr./jun. 2009 _xISSN 01013157 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20090521 _b1633^b _cMariana |
||
998 |
_a20140306 _b0927^b _ckarina |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c29210 _d29210 |
||
041 | _apor |