000			01602naa a2200205uu 4500
001			9052210021913
003			OSt
005			20190211165005.0
008			090522s2009 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aLAMBRIGHT, W. Henry _937026
245	1	0	_aThe rise and fall of interagency cooperation : _bthe U.S. global change research program
260			_aMalden, MA : _bBlackwell Publishers, _cjan./feb.1997
520	3		_aHarold Seidman has called interagency commitees " the crabgrass in the garden of extirpate them seldom succeed, for new committees grow in their place. This is because altenatives generally are worse, and there is a compelling need to coordinate programs that sprawl across many agencies. An example of an interagency committee that "worked," at least for a period, is the committee on environment and natural resources, charged with coordinating the multibillion dollar global change research program. Born under reagen, the committee rose to prominence under bush, being cited as an exemplary model for other interagency programs. Under Clinton, it was used as a prototype again, even as it declined in influence. The evolution of the committee illuminates the key factors that strengthen and weaken interagency coopeation in government.
590			_aPublic administration review PAR
590			_aJan./Feb. 1997 Volume 57 Number 1
773	0	8	_tPublic administration review: PAR _g57, 1, p. 36-44 _dMalden, MA : Blackwell Publishers, jan./feb.1997 _xISSN 00333352 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20090522 _b1002^b _cmayze
998			_a20090522 _b1030^b _cmayze
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c29220 _d29220
041			_aeng