000			01725naa a2200193uu 4500
001			9052211230713
003			OSt
005			20190211165008.0
008			090522s2009 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aSTREHR, Steven D _937030
245	1	0	_aTop bureaucrats and the distribution of influence in reagan's executive branch
260			_amalden, MA : _bBlackwell Publishers, _cjan./feb.1997
520	3		_aHoe did career executives think influence was distributed in their agencies during the reagen administration? Who would top bureacrats have preferred to exercise influence? Which actors did career executives believe had too much influence and which too little? This article investigates the attitudes of a sample of career members of the senior executive service regarding these questions. The dominant view of presidential-bureaucratic relations in the public administration literature emphasizes the influence exercised by bureaucrats, key members of congress, and representatives of interest groups at the expense of hierarchical guidance by agents of the president. The fundings reported here suggest that top bureaucrats (1) thought that political appointees were very influential in their agencies and, (2) wanted more influence to be exercised bu key political executives. the reagan team's administrative strategy was apparently successful in gaining the support of top members of the higher civil service.
590			_aPublic administration review PAR
590			_aJan./Feb. 1997 Volume 57 Number 1
773	0	8	_tPublic administration review: PAR _g57, 1, p. 75-82 _dmalden, MA : Blackwell Publishers, jan./feb.1997 _xISSN 00333352 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20090522 _b1123^b _cmayze
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c29224 _d29224
041			_aeng