000 | 01670naa a2200193uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 9052814404413 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211165032.0 | ||
008 | 090528s2009 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aREESE, Catherine C _937079 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 | _aThe line-item veto in practice in ten southern states |
260 |
_amalden, MA : _bBlackwell Publishers, _cnov./dec.1997 |
||
520 | 3 | _aHow frequently are line-item veto result in substantial reductions in annual appropriation totals? What reasons do governors provide for their use of the line-item veto? This study analyzes line-item vetoes cast in 10 southern states over the 1973-92 period. Information from each state is analyzed in relation to characteristics of state budgetary processes and political environments. The study uses the first collection of in-depth, multistae data on the use of the line-item veto power. The use of the line-item veto varies greatly among the states. The non-use of the line-item veto is linked with biennial budgets, less itemized appropriations, large numbers of appropriation bills, same-party control of the legislative and executive branches, and limited gubernatorial terms in office. The only factor associated with high usage of the line-item veto is divided party control; however, divided party control is not associated with great amounts of appropriation reduction. | |
590 | _aPublic administration review PAR | ||
590 | _aNov./Dec. 1997 Volume 57 Number 6 | ||
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tPublic administration review: PAR _g57, 6, p. 510-516 _dmalden, MA : Blackwell Publishers, nov./dec.1997 _xISSN 00333352 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20090528 _b1440^b _cmayze |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c29303 _d29303 |
||
041 | _aeng |