000			01913naa a2200193uu 4500
001			9052817441313
003			OSt
005			20190211165039.0
008			090528s2009 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aSVARA, James H _910445
245	1	0	_aThe politics-administration dichotomy model as aberration
260			_amalden, MA : _bBlackwell Publishers, _cjan./feb.1998
520	3		_aThe politics-administration dichotomy model has provided norms for officials and the starting point for research on the behavior of elected officials and administrators, particulary in local government. Although routinely rejected on empirical grounds, it is commonly viewed as the traditional statement of how officials should relate that can be traced to the "founders" of the field in the united states and the formulator of the council-manager form of government. Rexamination of the literature and the history of the council-manager form of government demostrates, however, that the model is not present in early writings in public administration and id not appear until the twenties. Supported by other aspects of "orthodox" public administration, the dichoto my model took hold during the thirties and in local government hung on into the sixtie. It should be viewd as an aberration that departed from the ideas that preceded and followed it rather than defended and reinterpreted to make it relevant to current practice. Recognizing the interdependent relationship between elected afficials and administrators - as did the framers of the council-manager from-leads to a model of complementarity rather than dichotomy.
590			_aPublic administration review PAR
590			_aJan./Feb. 1998 Volume 58 Number 1
773	0	8	_tPublic administration review: PAR _g58, 1, p. 51-58 _dmalden, MA : Blackwell Publishers, jan./feb.1998 _xISSN 00333352 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20090528 _b1744^b _cmayze
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c29318 _d29318
041			_aeng