000 | 01881naa a2200229uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 9061710354213 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211165058.0 | ||
008 | 090617s2009 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aMCENTIRE, David A _937223 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aA comparison of disaster paradigms : _bthe search for a holistic policy guide |
260 |
_aMalden, MA : _bBlackwell Publishers, _cmay/june 2002 |
||
520 | 3 | _aThe following article discusses the current emphasis and attention being given to the future of emergency management, as well as theoretical constructs designed to guide research and help practitioners reduce disaster. It illustrates that while the disaster-resistant community, disaster-resilient community, and sustainable development/sustainable hazards mitigation concepts provide many unique advantages for disaster scholarship and management, they fail to sufficiently address the triggering agents, functional areas, actors, variables, and disciplines pertaining to calamitous events. In making this argument, the article asserts that any future paradigm and policy guide must be built on—yet go further than—comprehensive emergency management. The article also reviews and alters the concept of invulnerable development. Finally, the article presents "comprehensive vulnerability management" as a paradigm and suggests that it is better suited to guide scholarly and practitioner efforts to understand and reduce disasters than the aforementioned perspectives. | |
590 | _aPublic Administration Review PAR | ||
590 | _aMay/June 2002 Volume 62 Number 3 | ||
700 | 1 |
_aFULLER, Christopher _937224 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aJOHNSTON, Chad W _937225 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aWEBER, Richard _937226 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tPublic Administration Review: PAR _g62, 3, p. 267-281 _dMalden, MA : Blackwell Publishers, may/june 2002 _xISSN 00333352 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20090617 _b1035^b _cmayze |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c29497 _d29497 |
||
041 | _aeng |