000 01845naa a2200217uu 4500
001 9061911100813
003 OSt
005 20231127172907.0
008 090619s2009 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100 1 _91558
_a Bryson, John M.
245 1 0 _aWhat to do when stakeholders matter :
_bthe case of problem formulation for the African American men project of hennepin couty, minnesota
260 _aMalden, MA :
_bBlackwell Publishers,
_csep./oct.2002
520 3 _aWe propose a series of stakeholder analyses designed to help organizations—especially governments—think and act strategically during the process of problem formulation in order to advance the common good. Specifically, we argue that at least five sets of analyses are necessary, including the creation of (1) a power versus interest grid; (2) a stakeholder influence diagram; (3) bases of power–directions of interest diagrams; (4) a map for finding the common good and structuring a winning argument; and (5) diagrams indicating how to tap individual stakeholder interests to pursue the common good. What the analyses do is help to transform a seemingly "wicked problem"—for example, how to produce better outcomes for African American men aged 18–30—into something more tractable, and therefore amenable to collective action. In other words, stakeholder analysis can be used to link political rationality with technical rationality so that support can be mobilized for substantive progress.
590 _aPublic Administration Review PAR
590 _aSeptember/October 2002 Volume 62 Number 5
700 1 _aCUNNINGHAM, Gary L
_937245
700 1 _aLOKKESMOE, Karen J
_937246
773 0 8 _tPublic Administration Review: PAR
_g62, 5, p. 568-584
_dMalden, MA : Blackwell Publishers, sep./oct.2002
_xISSN 00333352
_w
942 _cS
998 _a20090619
_b1110^b
_cmayze
999 _aConvertido do Formato PHL
_bPHL2MARC21 1.1
_c29534
_d29534
041 _aeng