000			01695naa a2200217uu 4500
001			9062215251513
003			OSt
005			20240229133950.0
008			090622s2009 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_91089 _aBertelli, Anthony M
245	1	0	_aManagerial responsibility
260			_aMalden, MA : _bBlackwell Publishers, _cmay/june 2003
520	3		_aThe concept of managerial responsibility is a shining thread in the literature of public administration, but its definition within our constitutional scheme remains elusive. How will we know responsible public management when we see it? We propose one answer: Public administration should be conducted according to what we term a "precept of managerial responsibility," which involves four interrelated elements derived from the classical literature of public administration: judgment, accountability, balance, and rationality. We apply this precept to one of the most vexing problems of public administration theory and practice, institutional reform litigation. This application illustrates how the precept solves a major theoretical problem of American public administration by defining a role for administrative officers that fully comports with the Madisonian scheme of separated institutions—legislative, executive, and judicial—sharing power.
590			_aPublic Administration Review PAR
590			_aMay/June 2003 Volume 63 Number 3
700	1		_aLYNN JUNIOR, Laurence E _937258
773	0	8	_tPublic Administration Review: PAR _g63, 3, p. 259-268 _dMalden, MA : Blackwell Publishers, may/june 2003 _xISSN 00333352 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20090622 _b1525^b _cmayze
998			_a20090626 _b1411^b _cMariana
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c29557 _d29557
041			_aeng