000 | 01874naa a2200205uu 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 9082018040637 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190211165203.0 | ||
008 | 090820s2009 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aPÉREZ, Antonia Ramírez _937355 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aMayors and local governing coalitions in democratic countries : _ba cross-national comparison |
260 |
_aBirmingham : _bTaylor & Francis, _cApril 2008 |
||
520 | 3 | _aThis paper focuses on the form or 'morphology' of mayor governing coalitions in municipalities of 11 democratic countries. If there exists an 'analytical consensus' regarding the form that these coalitions can adopt, the 'empirical consensus' seems to lean toward a modal form: the 'pro-growth coalition'. Nevertheless, our results show the existence of two other forms of mayor governing coalitions which are as numerous as the pro-growth: 'progressive coalitions' and 'integrative coalitions'. Therefore, these progressive and integrative coalitions, usually tested as case studies, have been shown here as empirical generalisations through a cross-national analysis that included 1700 cases. The aim of this paper is therefore to transcend 'empirical parochialism' in urban governance where the mayor is interested above all in urban growth and cooperation with business, and to give empirical generalisation to other local governance definitions, where local government leaders might be interested in implementing welfare policies with the cooperation of other political actors, be they parties, associations or upper levels of government. | |
700 | 1 |
_aYÁÑEZ, Clement J. Navarro _937356 |
|
700 | 1 |
_aCLARK, Terry N. _937357 |
|
773 | 0 | 8 |
_tLocal Government Studies _g34, 2, p. 147-178 _dBirmingham : Taylor & Francis, April 2008 _xISSN 03003930 _w |
942 | _cS | ||
998 |
_a20090820 _b1804^b _cDaiane |
||
998 |
_a20090827 _b1558^b _cDaiane |
||
999 |
_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c29684 _d29684 |
||
041 | _aeng |