000			01947naa a2200205uu 4500
001			9092115383113
003			OSt
005			20190211165418.0
008			090921s2009 xx ||||gr |0|| 0 eng d
100	1		_aJONAS, Andrew E. G _937655
245	1	0	_aUrban management and regeneration in the united states : _bstate intervention or redevelopment at all costs?
260			_bTaylor & Francis, _cjune2009
520	3		_aFor some commentators, urban regeneration in the United States is built around a narrowly economistic or neo-liberal model of redevelopment rather than a socially inclusive or participatory 'new regionalist' model. In considering whether or not there is a uniformly neo-liberal 'US model' of urban regeneration, this paper examines a variety of urban regeneration tools currently used in the US. These include: public-private partnerships; special purpose districts; revenue and general obligation bonds; tax-increment financing of redevelopment; and community activism and engagement. Although we discern a tendency towards 'redevelopment at all costs', actual regeneration tools as well as the uses to which they are put vary considerably according to conditions found in specific cities and metropolitan areas. We argue that the new Obama administration heralds a more interventionist federal urban policy regime. This new regime will be constructed out of the challenges posed by the material legacy of neo-liberal forms of urban development and the desire to build sustainable and inclusive metropolitan regions around a range of new federal infrastructural and housing programmes.
590			_aUrban regeneration; new regionalism; local economic development; United States
700	1		_aMCCARTHY, Linda _937656
773	0	8	_tLocal Government Studies _g35, 3, p. 299-314 _dTaylor & Francis, june2009 _xISSN 03003930 _w
942			_cS
998			_a20090921 _b1538^b _cmayze
998			_a20090922 _b1057^b _cCarolina
999			_aConvertido do Formato PHL _bPHL2MARC21 1.1 _c30028 _d30028
041			_aeng